Review Lenovo - 510a-15icb Desktop - Intel Core I5 - 8gb Memory - 1tb Hard Drive - Black
Economic system PCs take their place, equally enough of consumers only want a simple, affordable home computer for basic needs. The Lenovo IdeaCentre 510A ($499 as tested) fits the bill, an unassuming budget desktop with pocket-sized components at a low toll. There are no major flaws, merely relative to similarly priced contest, the IdeaCentre doesn't have anything special going for information technology from a build-quality point of view, and its AMD-powered performance, in sure measures, lags behind Intel-culling chips in some comparable budget systems. (The modestly improve graphics operation, though, does deport some light appeal.) The Acer Aspire TC-885-UA92, which nosotros're reviewing aslope it, is just $50 more with a superior CPU, more RAM, and more storage, making information technology our current top recommendation in this category.
Simple Styling
The Lenovo IdeaCentre 510A is very apparently, a gray rectangular belfry with unadorned sides and an almost equally simple forepart panel. There, a line runs vertically to split the panel unevenly, though it's more than just aesthetic.
Our Experts Have Tested 39 Products in the Desktop PCs Category in the Past Year
Since 1982, PCMag has tested and rated thousands of products to help you make improve buying decisions. (See how we test.)
Y'all tin can pull open this section of the front end panel to reveal a set of ports, including two USB 2.0 ports, two USB iii.0 Blazon-A ports, an SD menu slot, and microphone and headset jacks. On the other side of the forepart panel is a DVD+RW optical drive, simply other than that, this instance is about as uncomplicated as they come up.
Similar Products
It is, nonetheless, squeamish and compact. Budget desktops have no reason to be especially big, only still, it's a plus that this system has a minor size and tiny footprint. It measures fourteen.4 past 5.7 by 11.2 inches (HWD), not too alpine or broad and definitely less deep than average. This makes it a good fit for a tight workspace, including fitting on a crowded desk, a desk shelf cutout, or on the floor.
With a system so cheap and a design so simple, information technology's hard to have many complaints. An as simple keyboard and a basic mouse, both wired, are likewise included. Interior access isn't toolless, which could be a complaint if I was being picky, but it's not a big bargain. Two simple rear screws allow you lot to remove the left-side console, revealing the interior. Also in the rear are two USB 2.0 ports, an HDMI port, a VGA connection, and an Ethernet jack.
The system's interior is almost as simple as its outside, though there are a few things to discuss. A system at this price has no glitz or glam, including just the necessary components. There is a plate blocking most of your view, and access, when you showtime take off the outer panel.
It's more irritating to get this out of the way than it should exist, requiring you to clasp some clips and pull the front panel away for the plate to swing out. It took a few minutes to figure this out, and I found it choosy to open and close. Fortunately, there'southward a strong chance you'll never need to open a desktop like this upwardly, or at to the lowest degree not oftentimes, but you may desire to add together or swap memory or storage some twenty-four hours. To that end, at that place are ii memory slots for a maximum of 16GB of RAM, while at that place is just one M.2 slot, but room to add a hard drive.
What components lurk within beyond the metal plate? Not surprisingly, they are quite modest, including AMD'southward quad-core Ryzen 3 3200G processor with Radeon Vega 8 integrated graphics, 8GB of memory, and a 256GB solid-country drive. Depending on your needs, this could be perfectly adequate, and indeed, this is mostly the quotient of components you'll notice in this price range. There are some differences among competitors, though, and so read on to the side by side section to see how they perform.
Performance Testing: So-So Speed
For our criterion comparisons, I've gathered a batch of similarly cheap desktops. They all fall within the aforementioned low price range, just use a variety of components to get in that location. Below is a cheat sheet for their names and cadre components:
The ThinkCentre is our alone AMD representative, while the others all pack different Intel processors. At that place are a variety of chip types and generations among the grouping, including i Core i3 amidst mostly Cadre i5 CPUs, and one Core i5 flake that's newer than the residue. The Acer is carrying both the latest i5 and the most memory (not to mention twice the storage of the Lenovo), so it's the system to beat hither.
Productivity and Storage Tests
PCMark 10 and 8 are holistic performance suites adult by the PC criterion specialists at UL (formerly Futuremark). The PCMark 10 test nosotros run simulates different existent-earth productivity and content cosmos workflows. We utilize it to appraise overall system performance for office-centric tasks such as word processing, spreadsheet work, spider web browsing, and videoconferencing. PCMark 8, meanwhile, has a storage subtest that we apply to assess the speed of the system'southward boot bulldoze. Both yield proprietary numeric scores; higher numbers are better.
The Lenovo lags backside the rest in everyday productivity, the AMD APU unable to go along upwardly. It'south adequate for unproblematic dwelling house and office tasks, only non much more than that, and is wearisome enough compared to the better performers here that you may detect the difference in real-world utilize. Fortunately, its SSD is as snappy equally the others, leading to quick boot times and reducing wait time equally you navigate your files.
Media Processing and Content Creation Tests
Next is Maxon'southward CPU-crunching Cinebench R15 exam, which is fully threaded to make use of all available processor cores and threads. Cinebench stresses the CPU rather than the GPU to render a complex epitome. The result is a proprietary score indicating a PC's suitability for processor-intensive workloads.
Cinebench is often a good predictor of our Handbrake video editing trial, another tough, threaded workout that'southward highly CPU-dependent and scales well with cores and threads. In it, we put a stopwatch on test systems as they transcode a standard 12-minute clip of 4K video (the open up source Blender demo movie Tears of Steel) to a 1080p MP4 file. Lower elapsed times are better.
We also run a custom Adobe Photoshop image editing benchmark. Using an early on 2018 release of the Creative Deject version of Photoshop, we use a series of x circuitous filters and effects to a standard JPEG examination image, timing each functioning and adding up the total. The Photoshop test stresses the CPU, storage subsystem, and RAM, but it can also take advantage of almost GPUs to speed upwardly the process of applying filters, so systems with powerful graphics chips or cards may see a heave.
As on PCMark 10, the Lenovo is the slowest on average across these tests. To be sure, none of these desktops is a professional person-grade production car by any ways, but even in context, the 510A is slower than its counterparts.
Synthetic Graphics Tests
UL's 3DMark suite measures relative graphics muscle by rendering sequences of highly detailed, gaming-style 3D graphics that emphasize particles and lighting. Nosotros run 2 dissimilar 3DMark subtests, Heaven Diver and Fire Strike. Both are DirectX 11 benchmarks, but Sky Diver is more suited to laptops and midrange PCs, while Fire Strike is more demanding and made for high-end PCs to strut their stuff. The results are proprietary scores.
Adjacent up is another synthetic graphics test, this time from Unigine Corp. Like 3DMark, the Superposition test renders and pans through a detailed 3D scene and measures how the system copes. In this case, it'south rendered in the visitor'south eponymous Unigine engine for a second opinion on the machine's graphical prowess.
Every bit you can see, the trends from the CPU-centric tests don't keep hither. The AMD APU's integrated graphics elevation their Intel rivals (at to the lowest degree the generations on display here). This can help greatly with some casual gaming (and, in a existent pinch, some 3D apps).
A Decent Choice for Shoestring Budgets
The Lenovo IdeaCentre 510A is most as straightforward a desktop equally information technology looks on the outside, unassuming in design and modest in functioning. The price is very depression, then you lot can't mutter too much virtually its shortcomings or speed. And the onboard Vega graphics exercise give it an intriguing heave for (very) casual gamers who might want to practise some lite play without shelling out for a video card.
Yet, it doesn't look particularly good compared to machines that perform better or offering more for similar prices. This is especially true of the Acer Aspire, our recent Editors' Choice for the category. The IdeaCentre may be the about budget of the budget options, but information technology's probably not the best value—consider the every bit cheap HP Green-eyed Desktop (TE01-014) if you don't want to pay a flake more for the Aspire.
Lenovo IdeaCentre 510A
Cons
The Bottom Line
Lenovo's IdeaCentre 510A is an unassuming budget desktop in every sense. It'll perform bones tasks without hurting your wallet, only some alternatives exercise information technology better at this price signal.
Like What You're Reading?
Sign up for Lab Report to get the latest reviews and top product advice delivered right to your inbox.
This newsletter may contain advertizement, deals, or chapter links. Subscribing to a newsletter indicates your consent to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You lot may unsubscribe from the newsletters at whatsoever time.
Source: https://www.pcmag.com/reviews/lenovo-ideacentre-510a
0 Response to "Review Lenovo - 510a-15icb Desktop - Intel Core I5 - 8gb Memory - 1tb Hard Drive - Black"
ارسال یک نظر